Source type: Suzuki Uganda local distributor/source record
Suzuki Grand Vitara vs Toyota Land Cruiser FJ
A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Suzuki Grand Vitara
GRAND VITARA GLX 4WD 5D 1462p AT MILD HYBRID
Petrol Mild Hybrid
6-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 155,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW
🔧 138 Nm
⛽ 17.5 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser FJ
2.7 Petrol 6AT 4WD
Petrol
6-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 265,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 122 kW
🔧 245 Nm
⛽ 9.35 km/l
Decision summary
Suzuki Grand Vitara vs Toyota Land Cruiser FJ: the short answer
Land Cruiser FJ has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Grand Vitara remains close.
Grand Vitara starts UGX 110,000,000 cheaper
Grand Vitara from UGX 155,000,000 · Land Cruiser FJ from UGX 265,000,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | Grand Vitara | Land Cruiser FJ |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | Grand Vitara77 kW @ 6000 rpm | Land Cruiser FJ122 kW @ 5200 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | Grand Vitara138 Nm @ 4400 rpm | Land Cruiser FJ245 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Engine Size | Grand Vitara1462 cc | Land Cruiser FJ2694 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | Grand Vitara17.5 km/l | Land Cruiser FJ9.35 km/l |
| Ground Clearance | Grand VitaraNot Officially Disclosed | Land Cruiser FJ245 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Toyota Uganda/CFAO specifications; user-supplied estimates for remaining fields
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Grand Vitara
Strengths
- Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Fewer listed safety features
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader
Land Cruiser FJ
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Stronger listed safety equipment
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Published Practicality
Which One's Right for You?
Grand Vitara
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
Land Cruiser FJ
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | Grand Vitara | Land Cruiser FJ |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Generation | Current Uganda-market generation | First-generation Land Cruiser FJ with 2.7-litre petrol engine; separate from the earlier FJ Cruiser |
| Facelift History | Current-generation specification | No local facelift confirmed |
| Facelift Launched Since | 2023 | Original current-generation version |
| Facelift Version Ending | Current | Current |
| Body Style | Suv | SUV |
| Model Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Production Status | active | active |
| Segment | Passenger vehicle | Five-seat ladder-frame 4x4 SUV |
| Vehicle Type | Passenger SUV | Passenger SUV |
| Spec | Grand Vitara | Land Cruiser FJ |
|---|---|---|
| Length | Not Officially Disclosed | 4610 mm |
| Width | Not Officially Disclosed | 1855 mm |
| Height | Not Officially Disclosed | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase | Not Officially Disclosed | 2580 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | Not Officially Disclosed | 245 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 150 mm | 200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 l | 63 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | 373 l | 470 l |
| Kerb Weight | 500 kg | 1920 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | 500 kg | 2510 kg |
| Payload Capacity | Not Officially Disclosed | 590 kg |
| Towing Capacity | 1200 kg | 750 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Rows | 2 rows | 2 rows |
| Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 5.0 m | 5.5 m |
| Front Headroom | 1000 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | 1020 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Legroom | 860 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
In depth: how these cars differ
This Grand Vitara and Land Cruiser FJ comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: Grand Vitara 36 vs Land Cruiser FJ 49.
Efficiency index: Grand Vitara 72 vs Land Cruiser FJ 42.
Safety-equipment index: Grand Vitara 65 vs Land Cruiser FJ 95.
Practicality index: Grand Vitara 40 vs Land Cruiser FJ 65.
Ownership-cover index: Grand Vitara not separately scored vs Land Cruiser FJ not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
Grand Vitara and Land Cruiser FJ image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Suzuki Grand Vitara
View 8 more Grand Vitara images
Toyota Land Cruiser FJ
View 8 more Land Cruiser FJ images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Land Cruiser FJ leads by 12 points
Land Cruiser FJ has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Grand Vitara remains close.
Evidence leader
64
/100
Lead
12
points
Data
74%
source coverage
64
#1
Evidence leader
Land Cruiser FJ
Performance
49
Efficiency
42
Safety
95
Practicality
65
Leads by 12 points
52
#2
Grand Vitara
Performance
36
Efficiency
72
Safety
65
Practicality
40
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Land Cruiser FJ +13
Efficiency
Grand Vitara +30
Safety
Land Cruiser FJ +30
Practicality
Land Cruiser FJ +25
Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Land Cruiser FJ
Performance
49/100
Efficiency
42/100
Safety
95/100
Practicality
65/100
Grand Vitara
Performance
36/100
Efficiency
72/100
Safety
65/100
Practicality
40/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Land Cruiser FJ leads. However, Grand Vitara may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Uganda models and comparable body styles.
Grand Vitara vs Land Cruiser FJ questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.