Source type: Suzuki Uganda / CFAO Mobility
Suzuki Eeco vs Hyundai Staria Wagon
A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Suzuki Eeco
EECO CARGO 2WD 5D 1197p MT
Petrol
5-Speed Manual
Current
UGX 65,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 59 kW
🔧 104 Nm
⛽ 15.2 km/l
VS
Hyundai Staria Wagon
Staria 11-seater Wagon 2.2 Diesel AT 4x2
Diesel
8-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 230,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 130 kW
🔧 430 Nm
⛽ 12.99 km/l
Decision summary
Suzuki Eeco vs Hyundai Staria Wagon: the short answer
Staria Wagon holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Eeco.
Eeco starts UGX 165,000,000 cheaper
Eeco from UGX 65,000,000 · Staria Wagon from UGX 230,000,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | Eeco | Staria Wagon |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | Eeco59 kW @ 6000 rpm | Staria Wagon130 kW @ 3800 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | Eeco104 Nm @ 3000 rpm | Staria Wagon430 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm |
| Engine Size | Eeco1197 cc | Staria Wagon2199 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | Eeco15.2 km/l | Staria Wagon12.99 km/l |
| Ground Clearance | Eeco160 mm | Staria WagonNot Officially Disclosed |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Eeco
Strengths
- Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Fewer listed safety features
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader
Staria Wagon
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Stronger listed safety equipment
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Published Practicality
Which One's Right for You?
Eeco
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
Staria Wagon
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | Eeco | Staria Wagon |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Generation | Current Uganda-market generation | Current market generation |
| Facelift History | Current-generation specification | Current-generation specification |
| Facelift Launched Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Facelift Version Ending | Current | Current |
| Body Style | Van | MPV |
| Model Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Production Status | active | active |
| Segment | Light commercial vehicle | People carrier |
| Vehicle Type | Light commercial vehicle | Passenger MPV |
| Spec | Eeco | Staria Wagon |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 3675 mm | 5253 mm |
| Width | 1475 mm | 1997 mm |
| Height | 1825 mm | 1990 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2350 mm | 3273 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 160 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 150 mm | 160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 32 l | 75 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | 540 l | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Kerb Weight | 935 kg | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | 1540 kg | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Payload Capacity | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Towing Capacity | 500 kg | 1500 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 2 seats | 11 seats |
| Number of Rows | 1 rows | 4 rows |
| Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 4.5 m | 5.5 m |
| Front Headroom | 1000 mm | 1064 mm |
| Rear Headroom | Not Applicable | 1087 mm |
| Front Legroom | 1020 mm | 1027 mm |
| Rear Legroom | Not Applicable | 1025 mm |
In depth: how these cars differ
This Eeco and Staria Wagon comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: Eeco 28 vs Staria Wagon 59.
Efficiency index: Eeco 61 vs Staria Wagon 51.
Safety-equipment index: Eeco 36 vs Staria Wagon 61.
Practicality index: Eeco 49 vs Staria Wagon 69.
Ownership-cover index: Eeco not separately scored vs Staria Wagon not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
Eeco and Staria Wagon image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Suzuki Eeco
View 8 more Eeco images
Hyundai Staria Wagon
View 8 more Staria Wagon images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Staria Wagon leads by 19 points
Staria Wagon holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Eeco.
Evidence leader
61
/100
Lead
19
points
Data
66%
source coverage
61
#1
Evidence leader
Staria Wagon
Performance
59
Efficiency
51
Safety
61
Practicality
69
Leads by 19 points
42
#2
Eeco
Performance
28
Efficiency
61
Safety
36
Practicality
49
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Staria Wagon +31
Efficiency
Eeco +10
Safety
Staria Wagon +25
Practicality
Staria Wagon +20
Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Staria Wagon
Performance
59/100
Efficiency
51/100
Safety
61/100
Practicality
69/100
Eeco
Performance
28/100
Efficiency
61/100
Safety
36/100
Practicality
49/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Staria Wagon leads. However, Eeco may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Uganda models and comparable body styles.
Eeco vs Staria Wagon questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.