Toyota Coaster vs Toyota Land Cruiser 76

A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota Coaster in Uganda

Toyota Coaster

Coaster 4.2L Diesel 30-Seater MT Diesel 5-Speed Manual Current
UGX 395,000,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 96 kW 🔧 285 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 76 in Uganda

Toyota Land Cruiser 76

LC76 4.2L 5-MT 4x4 Diesel 5-Speed Manual Current
UGX 355,000,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 96 kW 🔧 285 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota Coaster vs Toyota Land Cruiser 76: the short answer

Coaster and Land Cruiser 76 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Land Cruiser 76 starts UGX 40,000,000 cheaper Coaster from UGX 395,000,000 · Land Cruiser 76 from UGX 355,000,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Coaster Land Cruiser 76
Maximum Power Coaster96 kW @ 3800 rpm Land Cruiser 7696 kW @ 3800 rpm
Maximum Torque Coaster285 Nm @ 2200 rpm Land Cruiser 76285 Nm @ 2200 rpm
Engine Size Coaster4164 cc Land Cruiser 764164 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Coaster12.5 km/l Land Cruiser 7612.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Coaster180 mm Land Cruiser 76230 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Coaster

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use

Land Cruiser 76

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Coaster

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Land Cruiser 76

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Coaster Land Cruiser 76
Model Introduced Year 2024 2023
Generation Current Uganda-market generation Uganda-listed LC76 70 Series wagon with the 4.2-litre 1HZ diesel and five-speed manual.
Facelift History Current Uganda-market version No local facelift confirmed
Facelift Launched Since 2024 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Bus Passenger/utility vehicle
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Bus segment Heavy-duty 4x4 wagon
Vehicle Type Bus Utility wagon
Spec Coaster Land Cruiser 76
Length 6990 mm 4720 mm
Width 2275 mm 1770 mm
Height 2635 mm 1955 mm
Wheelbase 3935 mm 2730 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 180 mm 230 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 165 mm 220 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 95 l 130 l
Boot/Cargo Space Not Officially Disclosed 1000 l
Kerb Weight 3350 kg 2245 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1500 kg 3060 kg
Payload Capacity 1500 kg 800 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 30 seats 10 seats
Number of Rows 8 rows Not Officially Disclosed
Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.5 m 6.3 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom 960 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1050 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 850 mm Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This Coaster and Land Cruiser 76 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Coaster 46 vs Land Cruiser 76 51.

Efficiency index: Coaster 54 vs Land Cruiser 76 54.

Safety-equipment index: Coaster 68 vs Land Cruiser 76 44.

Practicality index: Coaster 76 vs Land Cruiser 76 95.

Ownership-cover index: Coaster not separately scored vs Land Cruiser 76 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Coaster leads by 0 points

Coaster and Land Cruiser 76 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 61 /100
Lead 0 points
Data 69% source coverage
61
#1 Evidence leader

Coaster

69% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 76 Check Performance 46
Performance 46
Efficiency 54
Safety 68
Practicality 76
Leads by 0 points
61
#2

Land Cruiser 76

74% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 95 Check Safety 44
Performance 51
Efficiency 54
Safety 44
Practicality 95
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Land Cruiser 76 +5 Efficiency Level Safety Coaster +24 Practicality Land Cruiser 76 +19

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Coaster

Performance 46/100
Efficiency 54/100
Safety 68/100
Practicality 76/100

Land Cruiser 76

Performance 51/100
Efficiency 54/100
Safety 44/100
Practicality 95/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota Coaster leads the specification evidence index with 61 pts vs 61 pts for Land Cruiser 76

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Coaster leads. However, Land Cruiser 76 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.

Coaster vs Land Cruiser 76 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.