GWM Tank 300 vs Mahindra XUV3XO

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

GWM Tank 300 in South Africa

GWM Tank 300

2.0T Hi4-T Hybrid Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 849,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 240 kW 🔧 750 Nm ⛽ 2.8 km/l
VS
Mahindra XUV3XO in South Africa

Mahindra XUV3XO

1.2 AX5L AT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 374,999 ex-showroom
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Tank 300
Fuel Economy XUV3XO
🛡 Safety Tank 300
📦 Practicality Tank 300
🔑 Ownership Tank 300
XUV3XO starts ZAR 699900 cheaper Tank 300 from ZAR 699,900 · XUV3XO from ZAR 259,999

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Tank 300 XUV3XO
Engine Power 240 -
Torque 750 -
Engine Size 1999 -
Claimed Mileage 2.8 -
Ground Clearance 224 -
Boot Space 490 -
Airbags 8 -
Kerb Weight 2050 -
Seating Capacity 5 -
Warranty 5 -

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Tank 300 dominates this comparison with clear advantages across multiple categories.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Tank 300 +32 pts
Efficiency XUV3XO +17 pts
Safety Tank 300 +100 pts
Practicality Tank 300 +26 pts
Ownership Tank 300 +15 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

Tank 300

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

XUV3XO

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Tank 300

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

XUV3XO

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Tank 300 XUV3XO
0–100 km/h 167 sec -
0-100 km/h 167 sec -
Acceleration 0 100 167 sec -
Active Exhaust Not Available -
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged -
Battery Capacity 19.1 kWh -
Cylinder Bore 82.5 mm -
Combined System Power 255 -
Combined System Torque 615 -
Compression Ratio 10.5:1 -
Cylinder Layout Inline 4 (I4) -
Cylinders 4 -
Displacement 1999 cc -
Engine 2.0L GW4C20D Turbocharged Petrol + Rear Electric Motor -
Engine Code GW4C20D -
Engine Config 2.0L GW4C20D Turbocharged Petrol + Rear Electric Motor -
Engine Cylinders 4 -
Engine Displacement 1999 cc -
Engine Displacement Cc 1999 cc -
Engine Displacement Litres 2 l -
Engine Position Front Transverse -
Engine Power kW 240 kW -
Engine Torque Nm 750 Nm -
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged Petrol -
Engine Type Config Inline 4 Cylinder (I4) DOHC 16-Valve Turbocharged -
Engine Valves 16 -
EV Range 105 km -
Fuel Grade Required Petrol -
Fuel System Direct Injection -
Induction Turbocharged -
Max Power kW 240 kW -
Maximum Engine RPM 6,000 rpm -
Max Torque Nm 750 Nm -
Maximum Power 240 kW -
Maximum Torque 750 Nm -
Engine Oil Capacity 5.5 l -
Power 240 kW -
Power Assisted Steering Electric Power Assisted -
Power 322 bhp -
Power kW Rpm 5,500 rpm -
Power @ RPM 5,500 rpm -
Piston Stroke 93.1 mm -
Top Speed 195 km/h -
Torque 750 Nm -
Torque Nm Rpm 1,500-4,000 rpm -
Torque @ RPM 1,500-4,000 rpm -
Turbo Type Turbocharged -
Turbocharger Yes -
Valves per Cylinder 16 -
Variable Valve Timing Yes -
Spec Tank 300 XUV3XO
360 Degree Camera Yes -
Adaptive Cruise Control Yes -
Adaptive Cruise Control Yes -
Around View Monitor Yes -
Attention Assist Yes -
Autonomous Emergency Braking Yes -
Automatic High Beam Yes -
Auto Highbeam Yes -
Auto Lights Yes -
Auto Park Assist No -
Auto Wipers Yes -
Blind Spot Monitoring Yes -
Blind Spot Warning Yes -
Cruise Control Yes -
Drive Modes Yes -
Driver Fatigue Alert Yes -
Eco Mode Yes -
Emergency Braking Yes -
EV Mode Yes -
Forward Collision Warning Yes -
Front Camera Yes -
Lane Departure Warning Yes -
Lane Keep Assist Yes -
Park Assist Yes -
Parking Distance Sensors Front and Rear -
Parking Sensor Front and Rear -
Parking Sensors Front and Rear -
Pre-Collision System Yes -
Rain Sensor Wipers Yes -
Rear View Camera Yes -
Rear Cross Traffic Alert Yes -
Rear Parking Sensors Yes -
Rear View Camera Yes -
Reverse Camera Yes -
Reverse Camera Type Yes -
Reversing Camera Yes -
Sport Mode Yes -
Surround View Camera Yes -
Traffic Sign Recognition Yes -

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Tank 300 leads by 35 points

Tank 300 dominates this comparison with clear advantages across multiple categories.

Winner 74 /100
Lead 35 points
Data 97% confidence
74
#1 Winner

Tank 300

97% data confidence 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 100 Check Efficiency 33
Performance 82
Efficiency 33
Safety 100
Practicality 76
Ownership 65
Leads by 35 points
39
#2

XUV3XO

11% data confidence 0 strong categories
Best at Performance 50 Check Safety 0
Performance 50
Efficiency 50
Safety 0
Practicality 50
Ownership 50
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tank 300 +32 Efficiency XUV3XO +17 Safety Tank 300 +100 Practicality Tank 300 +26 Ownership Tank 300 +15

High confidence result.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Tank 300

Performance 82/100
Efficiency 33/100
Safety 100/100
Practicality 76/100
Ownership 65/100

XUV3XO

Performance 50/100
Efficiency 50/100
Safety 0/100
Practicality 50/100
Ownership 50/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 GWM Tank 300 wins with 74 pts vs 39 pts for XUV3XO

In structured scoring, Tank 300 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, XUV3XO may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Tank 300 edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Tank 300 33 vs XUV3XO 50. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Tank 300 100, XUV3XO 0. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Tank 300 65, XUV3XO 50. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Tank 300 76, XUV3XO 50. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Tank 300 82, XUV3XO 50. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Tank 300 edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Tank 300 scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Tank 300 and XUV3XO in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Tank 300 scores 82 vs 50.

Efficiency: Tank 300 scores 33 vs 50.

Safety: Tank 300 scores 100 vs 0.

Practicality: Tank 300 scores 76 vs 50.

Ownership: Tank 300 scores 65 vs 50.

Final structured scoring gives Tank 300 the advantage in this comparison.