Nissan Magnite vs Ford Puma

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Nissan Magnite in South Africa

Nissan Magnite

1.0 KURO 5MT Petrol Manual
ZAR 315,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 53 kW (71 hp)
🔧 96 Nm
⛽ 19 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
+

Want to throw in a 3rd car?

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Puma
Petrol Economy Magnite
🔑 Ownership Cost Tie

The Overall Score — Here's How They Stack Up

🏆 Winner
#1

Puma

61
/ 100
+12
pts
#2

Magnite

49
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

The Bottom Line

Puma has a slight advantage, but Magnite remains highly competitive.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Puma +4 pts
Efficiency Magnite +6 pts
Safety Puma +14 pts
Practicality Equal
Ownership Equal

Score Breakdown by Category

🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Magnite

Performance 4/20
Efficiency 15/20
Safety 6/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Magnite

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Highway Driving

Which One's Right for You?

Magnite

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Puma

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Magnite Puma
Ground Clearance 205 170
Wheelbase 2500 2594
Length 3994 4186
Width 1758 1805
Height 1572 1531
Kerb Weight 1035 1325
Gross Vehicle Weight 1500 1775
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 336 456
Towing Capacity 500 1200
Front Track Width - 1541
Rear Track Width - 1534
Turning Radius - 5.4
Spec Magnite Puma
Engine 1.0L Naturally Aspirated Petrol 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type Inline 3 Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement 999 999
Cylinders 3 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 53 92
Torque 96 170
Fuel System Multipoint Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 150 185
0-100 km/h 14.5 10.5
Power @ RPM - 6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM - 2000-4500 rpm
Turbocharger - Single Turbo
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Ford Puma wins with 61 pts vs 49 pts for Magnite

In structured scoring, Puma emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Magnite may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

Based on structured category scoring, Puma performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Magnite scores 15 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Magnite scores 6 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Magnite scores 12 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Magnite 12 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Magnite scoring 4 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Puma may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Puma performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Puma the overall advantage.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Magnite and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Magnite scores 4 vs 8.

Efficiency: Magnite scores 15 vs 9.

Safety: Magnite scores 6 vs 20.

Practicality: Magnite scores 12 vs 12.

Ownership: Magnite scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Puma the advantage in this comparison.