Hyundai i20 vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Hyundai i20 in South Africa

Hyundai i20

1.0T Fluid Petrol manual
328,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 74 kW (99 hp)
🔧 172 Nm
⛽ 18.2 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Puma
Mileage Puma
🔑 Ownership i20

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Puma

61
/ 100
+4
pts
#2

i20

57
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both i20 and Puma are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Puma +1 pts
Efficiency Puma +9 pts
Safety Puma +2 pts
Practicality Equal
Ownership i20 +8 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

i20

Performance 7/20
Efficiency 0/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 20/20

Pros & Cons

i20

Pros
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: General Use
🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

i20

  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Puma

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specification Comparison

Specification i20 Puma
Length 4040 4186
Width 1775 1805
Height 1505 1531
Wheelbase 2580 2594
Ground Clearance 195 170
Kerb Weight 1135 1325
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 352 456
Gross Vehicle Weight - 1775
Towing Capacity - 1200
Front Track Width - 1541
Rear Track Width - 1534
Turning Radius - 5.4
Specification i20 Puma
Engine 1.0 T-GDI Turbo 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type Petrol Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement 998 999
Cylinders 3 3
Power 74 92
Torque 172 170
Fuel System Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Yes Single Turbo
Top Speed 185 185
0-100 km/h 11.0 10.5
Power @ RPM @ 5500 rpm 6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM @ 1500 rpm 2000-4500 rpm
Valves per Cylinder - 4
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Puma wins with 61 pts vs 57 pts for i20

In structured scoring, Puma emerges as the stronger overall package. However, i20 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Puma performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

i20 scores 0 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, i20 scores 18 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

i20 scores 20 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives i20 12 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows i20 scoring 7 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Puma may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Puma performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Puma the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between i20 and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: i20 scores 7 vs 8.

Efficiency: i20 scores 0 vs 9.

Safety: i20 scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: i20 scores 12 vs 12.

Ownership: i20 scores 20 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Puma the advantage in this comparison.