Honda Fit vs Ford Territory

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda Fit in South Africa

Honda Fit

ZAR 380,500 – 380,500
⚡ 109 hp
🔧 253 Nm
⛽ 26 km/l
VS
Ford Territory in South Africa

Ford Territory

ZAR 520,000 – 610,000
⚡ 140 hp
🔧 320 Nm
⛽ 13.5 km/l

Quick Winners

Performance Territory
Mileage Fit
🔑 Ownership Territory

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

Fit

69
out of 100
1
point lead
Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Territory

68
out of 100

Executive Summary

Both Fit and Territory are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Territory +3 pts
Efficiency Fit +12 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality Territory +4 pts
Ownership Territory +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Fit

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 20/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 12/20

Territory

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 16/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Fit

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Territory

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Fit

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Territory

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Fit Territory
Ground Clearance 135 190
Wheelbase 2530 2716
Length 3995 4630
Width 1695 1935
Height 1515 1706
Kerb Weight 1150 1635
Gross Vehicle Weight 1550 2150
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 304 448
Towing Capacity 800 1200
Specification Fit Territory
Engine 1.5L Hybrid Petrol 1.8L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Atkinson Cycle with Electric Motor Inline 4 Turbocharged
Displacement 1498 1798
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 109 140
Torque 253 320
Fuel System Direct Injection + Electric Motor Assist Direct Injection
Top Speed 175 185
0-100 km/h 10.5 9.8

Final Verdict

🏆 Honda Fit wins this comparison with 69 points vs 68 points for Territory.

In structured scoring, Fit emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Territory may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Fit performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Fit scores 20 while Territory scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Fit scores 18 and Territory scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Fit scores 12 versus Territory scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Fit 9 and Territory 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Fit scoring 10 compared to Territory scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Fit may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Fit performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Fit the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Fit and Territory in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Fit scores 10 vs 13.

Efficiency: Fit scores 20 vs 8.

Safety: Fit scores 18 vs 18.

Practicality: Fit scores 9 vs 13.

Ownership: Fit scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Fit the advantage in this comparison.