Ford Everest vs Hyundai Santa Fe

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes an archived model

Current and archived cars are compared side by side. Archived models keep their verified historical specs, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai Santa Fe
Ford Everest in South Africa

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,340,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 184 kW 🔧 600 Nm ⛽ 11.8 km/l
VS
Hyundai Santa Fe in South Africa

Hyundai Santa Fe

2.2D 4WD Executive Diesel Automatic Archive reference
ZAR 899,900 last listed
No longer sold new Specs stay visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 147 kW 🔧 440 Nm ⛽ 13.8 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Everest
Fuel Economy Everest
🛡 Safety Santa Fe
📦 Practicality Everest
🔑 Ownership Santa Fe
Everest starts ZAR 899900 cheaper Everest from ZAR 825,000 · Santa Fe from ZAR 899,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Everest Santa Fe
Engine Power 184 kW 147 kW
Torque 600 Nm 440 Nm
Engine Size 2993 cc 2199 cc
Claimed Mileage 11.8 km/l 13.8 km/l
Ground Clearance 226 mm 188 mm
Boot / Load Bay Three-row cargo area 703 l
Airbags 6 7
Kerb Weight 2450 kg 1980 kg
Seating Capacity 7 7
Warranty 4 years / 120 000 km 5

= leads in this spec

Archived models stay fully comparable. Verified specs remain visible; historical fields that were not source-confirmed are marked Not confirmed instead of being guessed.

The Bottom Line

Santa Fe has a slight advantage, but Everest remains highly competitive.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Everest +17 pts
Efficiency Everest +2 pts
Safety Santa Fe +54 pts
Practicality Everest +3 pts
Ownership Santa Fe +31 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Everest

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage
🏆 Overall Winner

Santa Fe

Strengths
  • Stronger safety package
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

Everest

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Santa Fe

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Everest Santa Fe
Model Introduced Year 2015 2001
Generation Currently sold Everest belongs to the latest generation with enhanced comfort and safety systems Fifth generation Santa Fe on Hyundai's i-GMP platform; 'Sensuous Sportiness' design with distinctive parametric LED lighting signature
Facelift History Major generational update in 2022 with improved safety, technology, and design Fifth generation launched in SA in 2022; significant styling and interior quality upgrade; distinctive boxy design language with vertical lighting
Facelift Launched Since 2022 2022
Facelift Version Ending Current Discontinued - exact end year not confirmed
Body Style SUV Not confirmed
Color Note White, Black, Silver, Grey, Blue Not confirmed
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup Not confirmed
Drivetrain Note Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Not confirmed
Model Year 2026 Not confirmed
Production Status active Not confirmed
Segment Large SUV Not confirmed
Vehicle Type SUV Not confirmed
Spec Everest Santa Fe
Ground Clearance 226 mm 188 mm
Wheelbase 2900 mm 2815 mm
Length 4914 mm 4830 mm
Width 1923 mm 1900 mm
Height 1842 mm 1750 mm
Kerb Weight 2450 kg 1980 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight - Not confirmed
Seating Capacity 7 7
Boot Space Three-row cargo area 703 l
Towing Capacity 3500 kg Not confirmed
Front Track Width - Not confirmed
Rear Track Width - Not confirmed
Turning Radius - Not confirmed
Load Bed Length Three-row cargo area 703 l
Load Bed Width - Not confirmed
Front Legroom - Not confirmed
Rear Legroom - Not confirmed
Front Headroom - Not confirmed
Rear Headroom - Not confirmed
Front Shoulder Room - Not confirmed
Rear Shoulder Room - Not confirmed
Boot Space Seats Folded - Not confirmed
Number of Doors 5 5
Max Payload - Not confirmed
Boot Volume Three-row cargo area 703 l
Doors 5 5
Seats 7 7
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 l 67 l
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg - Not confirmed
Ground Clearance Max 226 mm 188 mm
Ground Clearance Min 226 mm 188 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 226 mm 188 mm
Height Mm 1842 mm 1750 mm
Length Mm 4914 mm 4830 mm
Loadbox Length Mm Three-row cargo area 703 l
Loadbox Width Mm - Not confirmed
Payload Kg - Not confirmed
Cargo Volume Three-row cargo area 703 l
Tare Mass Kg 2450 kg 1980 kg
Turning Circle - Not confirmed
Turning Circle M - Not confirmed
Width Mm 1923 mm 1900 mm

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Santa Fe leads by 11 points

Santa Fe has a slight advantage, but Everest remains highly competitive.

Winner 77 /100
Lead 11 points
Data 88% confidence
77
#1 Winner

Santa Fe

88% data confidence 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Efficiency 50
Performance 74
Efficiency 50
Safety 99
Practicality 89
Ownership 65
Leads by 11 points
66
#2

Everest

77% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 92 Check Ownership 34
Performance 91
Efficiency 52
Safety 45
Practicality 92
Ownership 34
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Everest +17 Efficiency Everest +2 Safety Santa Fe +54 Practicality Everest +3 Ownership Santa Fe +31

Moderate difference between the models.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Santa Fe

Performance 74/100
Efficiency 50/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 89/100
Ownership 65/100

Everest

Performance 91/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 45/100
Practicality 92/100
Ownership 34/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Hyundai Santa Fe wins with 77 pts vs 66 pts for Everest

In structured scoring, Santa Fe emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Everest may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Santa Fe edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Everest 52 vs Santa Fe 50. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Everest 45, Santa Fe 99. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Everest 34, Santa Fe 65. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Everest 92, Santa Fe 89. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Everest 91, Santa Fe 74. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Santa Fe edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Santa Fe scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Everest and Santa Fe in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Everest scores 91 vs 74.

Efficiency: Everest scores 52 vs 50.

Safety: Everest scores 45 vs 99.

Practicality: Everest scores 92 vs 89.

Ownership: Everest scores 34 vs 65.

Final structured scoring gives Santa Fe the advantage in this comparison.