Ford Everest vs Honda HR-V

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Everest

Change Car A

ZAR 750,000 – 900,000

⚡ 154 hp

🔧 500 Nm

⛽ 13.2 km/l

Honda HR-V

Change Car B

ZAR 489,900 – 529,900

⚡ 119 hp

🔧 145 Nm

⛽ 16.2 km/l

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance Everest

⛽ Mileage HR-V

🔑 Ownership Everest

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

Everest

out of 100

point lead

Moderate difference between the two models.

HR-V

out of 100

Executive Summary

Everest holds a noticeable edge over HR-V, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Everest +8 pts

Efficiency HR-V +4 pts

Safety Everest +8 pts

Practicality HR-V +1 pts

Ownership Everest +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Performance 17/20

Efficiency 6/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 12/20

Ownership 16/20

HR-V

Performance 9/20

Efficiency 10/20

Safety 12/20

Practicality 13/20

Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Pros

More powerful engine output
Stronger safety package
Better long-term ownership value

Cons

Lower fuel efficiency
Less practical in daily usage

Best For: Highway Driving

HR-V

Pros

Better fuel efficiency
More practical for daily use

Cons

Less powerful engine setup
Less comprehensive safety features
Shorter warranty coverage

Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Everest

Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

HR-V

Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification	Everest	HR-V
Ground Clearance	225	196
Wheelbase	2900	2610
Length	4914	4340
Width	1923	1790
Height	1842	1590
Kerb Weight	2400	1320
Gross Vehicle Weight	3150	1750
Seating Capacity	7	5
Boot Space	259	437
Towing Capacity	3500	1200

Specification	Everest	HR-V
Engine	2.0L Bi-Turbo Diesel	1.5L i-VTEC Petrol
Engine Type	Inline 4 Twin Turbocharged	Inline 4 Cylinder Naturally Aspirated
Displacement	1996	1498
Cylinders	4	4
Valves per Cylinder	4	4
Power	154	119
Torque	500	145
Fuel System	Common Rail Direct Injection	Multi-Point Fuel Injection
Top Speed	190	185
0-100 km/h	9.8	11.8

Specification	Everest	HR-V
Transmission	10-Speed Automatic	CVT Automatic
Drive Type	4x4	4x2
Drivetrain Layout	Selectable 4WD	Front Wheel Drive
LSD Available	Electronic	Not Available
Transfer Case	Low Range Available	Not Applicable

Specification	Everest	HR-V
Claimed Mileage	13.2	16.2
City Mileage	8	13
Highway Mileage	12	17
Fuel Tank Capacity	80	40
Emission Standard	Euro 5	Euro 5

Specification	Everest	HR-V
Airbags	7	4
ABS	Standard	Standard
Electronic Stability Control	Standard	Standard
Traction Control	Standard	Standard
Hill Descent Control	Standard	Not Available
Child Safety Lock	Standard	Standard
ISOFIX Mounts	Standard	Standard
Brake Assist	Standard	Standard
Tyre Pressure Monitor	Standard	Not Available
Engine Immobiliser	Standard	Standard

Specification	Everest	HR-V
Cruise Control	Standard	Standard
Adaptive Cruise Control	Standard	Not Available
Lane Keep Assist	Standard	Not Available
Blind Spot Monitoring	Standard	Not Available
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	Standard	Not Available
Parking Sensors	Front and Rear	Rear
Rear View Camera	Standard	Standard
360 Degree Camera	Standard	Not Available
Autonomous Emergency Braking	Standard	Not Available

Specification	Everest	HR-V
Seat Material	Leather	Fabric
Seat Adjustment	8-Way Power Driver	Manual
Heated Seats	Front	Not Available
Ventilated Seats	Not Available	Not Available
Steering Type	Electric Power Assisted	Electric Power Steering
Steering Adjustment	Tilt and Telescopic	Tilt and Telescopic
Ambient Lighting	Standard	Not Available

Specification	Everest	HR-V
Climate Control	Dual Zone Automatic	Manual
Power Windows	Standard	All Doors
Keyless Entry	Smart Key	Remote Key
Push Button Start	Standard	Standard
Wireless Charging	Standard	Not Available
Sunroof	Panoramic	Not Available
Electric Tailgate	Hands-free	Not Available

Specification	Everest	HR-V
Infotainment Screen	12-inch Touchscreen	8-inch Touchscreen
Apple CarPlay	Wireless	Standard
Android Auto	Wireless	Standard
Bluetooth Connectivity	Standard	Standard
Number of Speakers	10	6
Navigation System	Built-in	Not Available

Specification	Everest	HR-V
LED Headlamps	Matrix LED	LED Reflector
Daytime Running Lamps	LED	LED
Fog Lamps	LED	Front
Roof Rails	Black	Standard
Alloy Wheel Design	20-inch Alloy	17-inch Steel with Covers

Specification	Everest	HR-V
Approach Angle	30	18
Departure Angle	26	20
Wading Depth	800	350
Terrain Modes	Normal	Not Available
Locking Differential	Electronic Rear	Not Available

Specification	Everest	HR-V
Tyre Size	255/55 R20	215/60 R17
Wheel Type	Alloy	Steel with Covers
Front Brake Type	Vented Disc	Disc
Rear Brake Type	Disc	Disc

Specification	Everest	HR-V
Front Suspension	Double Wishbone	MacPherson Strut
Rear Suspension	Multi-link Coil Spring	Torsion Beam
Chassis Type	Ladder Frame	Monocoque

Specification	Everest	HR-V
Service Interval	15000 km / 12 months	10000 km / 12 months
Approx Service Cost	Moderate	Moderate
Battery Warranty	2 Years	24 Months

Specification	Everest	HR-V
Warranty Years	4	3
Warranty Kilometers	120000	100000
Roadside Assistance	4 Years	3 Years

Specification	Everest	HR-V
CO2 Emissions	198	140
Start Stop System	Standard	Standard
Hybrid System Type	Not Applicable	Not Applicable

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Everest wins this comparison with 71 points vs 56 points for HR-V.

In structured scoring, Everest emerges as the stronger overall package. However, HR-V may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Everest performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Everest scores 6 while HR-V scores 10 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Everest scores 20 and HR-V scores 12. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Everest scores 16 versus HR-V scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Everest 12 and HR-V 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Everest scoring 17 compared to HR-V scoring 9, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Everest may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Everest performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Everest the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Everest and HR-V in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Everest scores 17 vs 9.

Efficiency: Everest scores 6 vs 10.

Safety: Everest scores 20 vs 12.

Practicality: Everest scores 12 vs 13.

Ownership: Everest scores 16 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Everest the advantage in this comparison.

Ford Everest vs Honda HR-V

Ford Everest

Honda HR-V

Quick Winners

Overall Comparison Score

Everest

HR-V

Executive Summary

Key Differences At A Glance

Category Score Breakdown

Everest

HR-V

Pros & Cons

Everest

HR-V

Who Should Buy Which?

Everest

HR-V

Full Specification Comparison

Final Verdict

Related Comparisons

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Comparison Analysis