Ford Everest vs Honda Fit

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Everest

Change Car A

ZAR 750,000 – 900,000

⚡ 154 hp

🔧 500 Nm

⛽ 13.2 km/l

Honda Fit

Change Car B

ZAR 380,500 – 380,500

⚡ 109 hp

🔧 253 Nm

⛽ 26 km/l

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance Everest

⛽ Mileage Fit

🔑 Ownership Everest

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

Everest

out of 100

point lead

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Fit

out of 100

Executive Summary

Both Everest and Fit are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Everest +7 pts

Efficiency Fit +14 pts

Safety Everest +2 pts

Practicality Everest +3 pts

Ownership Everest +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Performance 17/20

Efficiency 6/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 12/20

Ownership 16/20

Fit

Performance 10/20

Efficiency 20/20

Safety 18/20

Practicality 9/20

Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Pros

More powerful engine output
Stronger safety package
More practical for daily use
Better long-term ownership value

Cons

Lower fuel efficiency

Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Fit

Pros

Better fuel efficiency

Cons

Less powerful engine setup
Less comprehensive safety features
Less practical in daily usage
Shorter warranty coverage

Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

Everest

Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
Large families needing more practicality and usability
Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Fit

Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specification Comparison

Specification	Everest	Fit
Ground Clearance	225	135
Wheelbase	2900	2530
Length	4914	3995
Width	1923	1695
Height	1842	1515
Kerb Weight	2400	1150
Gross Vehicle Weight	3150	1550
Seating Capacity	7	5
Boot Space	259	304
Towing Capacity	3500	800

Specification	Everest	Fit
Engine	2.0L Bi-Turbo Diesel	1.5L Hybrid Petrol
Engine Type	Inline 4 Twin Turbocharged	Inline 4 Cylinder Atkinson Cycle with Electric Motor
Displacement	1996	1498
Cylinders	4	4
Valves per Cylinder	4	4
Power	154	109
Torque	500	253
Fuel System	Common Rail Direct Injection	Direct Injection + Electric Motor Assist
Top Speed	190	175
0-100 km/h	9.8	10.5

Specification	Everest	Fit
Transmission	10-Speed Automatic	eCVT Automatic
Drive Type	4x4	4x2
Drivetrain Layout	Selectable 4WD	Front Wheel Drive
LSD Available	Electronic	Not Available
Transfer Case	Low Range Available	Not Applicable

Specification	Everest	Fit
Claimed Mileage	13.2	26
City Mileage	8	24
Highway Mileage	12	27
Fuel Tank Capacity	80	40
Emission Standard	Euro 5	Euro 6

Specification	Everest	Fit
Airbags	7	6
ABS	Standard	Standard
Electronic Stability Control	Standard	Standard
Traction Control	Standard	Standard
Hill Descent Control	Standard	Not Available
Child Safety Lock	Standard	Standard
ISOFIX Mounts	Standard	Standard
Brake Assist	Standard	Standard
Tyre Pressure Monitor	Standard	Standard
Engine Immobiliser	Standard	Standard

Specification	Everest	Fit
Cruise Control	Standard	Adaptive
Adaptive Cruise Control	Standard	Standard
Lane Keep Assist	Standard	Standard
Blind Spot Monitoring	Standard	Standard
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	Standard	Standard
Parking Sensors	Front and Rear	Front and Rear
Rear View Camera	Standard	Standard
360 Degree Camera	Standard	Optional
Autonomous Emergency Braking	Standard	Standard

Specification	Everest	Fit
Seat Material	Leather	Premium Fabric
Seat Adjustment	8-Way Power Driver	Manual
Heated Seats	Front	Optional
Ventilated Seats	Not Available	Not Available
Steering Type	Electric Power Assisted	Electric Power Steering
Steering Adjustment	Tilt and Telescopic	Tilt and Telescopic
Ambient Lighting	Standard	Standard

Specification	Everest	Fit
Climate Control	Dual Zone Automatic	Automatic Climate Control
Power Windows	Standard	All Doors Auto
Keyless Entry	Smart Key	Smart Key
Push Button Start	Standard	Standard
Wireless Charging	Standard	Optional
Sunroof	Panoramic	Not Available
Electric Tailgate	Hands-free	Not Available

Specification	Everest	Fit
Infotainment Screen	12-inch Touchscreen	9-inch Touchscreen
Apple CarPlay	Wireless	Wireless
Android Auto	Wireless	Wireless
Bluetooth Connectivity	Standard	Standard
Number of Speakers	10	6
Navigation System	Built-in	Built-in

Specification	Everest	Fit
LED Headlamps	Matrix LED	LED Projector
Daytime Running Lamps	LED	LED
Fog Lamps	LED	LED
Roof Rails	Black	Not Available
Alloy Wheel Design	20-inch Alloy	16-inch Alloy

Specification	Everest	Fit
Approach Angle	30	14
Departure Angle	26	16
Wading Depth	800	250
Terrain Modes	Normal	EV Eco Normal
Locking Differential	Electronic Rear	Not Available

Specification	Everest	Fit
Tyre Size	255/55 R20	185/55 R16
Wheel Type	Alloy	Alloy
Front Brake Type	Vented Disc	Disc
Rear Brake Type	Disc	Drum

Specification	Everest	Fit
Front Suspension	Double Wishbone	MacPherson Strut
Rear Suspension	Multi-link Coil Spring	Torsion Beam
Chassis Type	Ladder Frame	Monocoque

Specification	Everest	Fit
Service Interval	15000 km / 12 months	10000 km / 12 months
Approx Service Cost	Moderate	Low
Battery Warranty	2 Years	8 Years

Specification	Everest	Fit
Warranty Years	4	3
Warranty Kilometers	120000	100000
Roadside Assistance	4 Years	3 Years

Specification	Everest	Fit
CO2 Emissions	198	90
Start Stop System	Standard	Standard
Hybrid System Type	Not Applicable	Self-Charging Hybrid

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Everest wins this comparison with 71 points vs 69 points for Fit.

In structured scoring, Everest emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Fit may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Everest performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Everest scores 6 while Fit scores 20 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Everest scores 20 and Fit scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Everest scores 16 versus Fit scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Everest 12 and Fit 9, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Everest scoring 17 compared to Fit scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Everest may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Everest performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Everest the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Everest and Fit in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Everest scores 17 vs 10.

Efficiency: Everest scores 6 vs 20.

Safety: Everest scores 20 vs 18.

Practicality: Everest scores 12 vs 9.

Ownership: Everest scores 16 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Everest the advantage in this comparison.

Ford Everest vs Honda Fit

Ford Everest

Honda Fit

Quick Winners

Overall Comparison Score

Everest

Fit

Executive Summary

Key Differences At A Glance

Category Score Breakdown

Everest

Fit

Pros & Cons

Everest

Fit

Who Should Buy Which?

Everest

Fit

Full Specification Comparison

Final Verdict

Related Comparisons

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Comparison Analysis