Volkswagen Amarok vs Toyota Land Cruiser 79

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Volkswagen Amarok in South Africa

Volkswagen Amarok

3.0 V6 TDI Double Cab Aventura 4Motion AT Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,252,200 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW 🔧 400 Nm ⛽ 12.8 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 79 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 79

4.0 V6 Double Cab MT Petrol Manual
ZAR 870,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW 🔧 381 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Land Cruiser 79
Fuel Economy Amarok
🛡 Safety Amarok
📦 Practicality Land Cruiser 79
🔑 Ownership Tie
Amarok starts ZAR 706200 cheaper Amarok from ZAR 593,200 · Land Cruiser 79 from ZAR 706,200

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Amarok Land Cruiser 79
Engine Power 125 202
Torque 400 381
Engine Size 1968 3956
Claimed Mileage 12.8 13.0
Ground Clearance 192 235
Boot Space 0 Not Available
Airbags 6 2
Kerb Weight 2095 2050
Seating Capacity Available Available
Warranty 3 3

= leads in this spec

The Overall Score — Here's How They Stack Up

🏆 Winner
#1

Amarok

57
/ 100
+12
pts
#2

Land Cruiser 79

45
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

The Bottom Line

Amarok has a slight advantage, but Land Cruiser 79 remains highly competitive.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Land Cruiser 79 +5 pts
Efficiency Amarok +7 pts
Safety Amarok +12 pts
Practicality Land Cruiser 79 +2 pts
Ownership Equal

Score Breakdown by Category

🏆 Overall Winner

Amarok

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

Land Cruiser 79

Performance 18/20
Efficiency 0/20
Safety 6/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 12/20

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

Amarok

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency

Land Cruiser 79

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

Amarok

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Land Cruiser 79

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Amarok Land Cruiser 79
Ground Clearance 192 235
Wheelbase 3097 3085
Length 5254 5270
Width 1944 1855
Height 1834 1855
Kerb Weight 2095 2050
Gross Vehicle Weight 3150 3100
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 0 Not Available
Towing Capacity 3500 3500
Number of Doors 5 5
Boot Space Seats Folded 1500 1500
Front Track Width 1550 1550
Rear Track Width 1540 1540
Turning Radius Available 6.4
Load Bed Length Available Available
Load Bed Width Available Available
Front Legroom Available Available
Rear Legroom Available Available
Front Headroom Available Available
Rear Headroom Available Available
Front Shoulder Room Available Available
Rear Shoulder Room Available Available
Max Payload Available Available
Boot Volume Available Available
Doors Available Available
Seats Available Available
Front Overhang Available Available
Fuel Tank Capacity Available Available
Rear Overhang Available Available
Spec Amarok Land Cruiser 79
Engine 2.0L TDI Turbo Diesel 1GR-FE
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled V6
Displacement 1968 3956
Cylinders 4 6
Valves per Cylinder 4 24
Power 125 202
Torque 400 381
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Multi-Point EFI
Turbocharger Twin Turbo No
Top Speed 180 175
0-100 km/h 10.5 9.5
Cylinder Layout Inline 4 (I4) Inline 4 (I4)
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Turbocharged
Engine Code Standard Standard
Compression Ratio 10.5:1 10.5:1
Cylinder Bore 82.0 82.0
Piston Stroke 92.0 92.0
Fuel Grade Required Petrol Petrol
Power @ RPM 150 5600 rpm
Torque @ RPM 400 4400 rpm
Engine Position Available Available
Engine Oil Capacity Available Available
Power 150 150
Variable Valve Timing Available Available
Maximum Engine RPM Available Available
Engine Type Config Available Available
0–100 km/h Available Available
Battery Capacity Available Available
Charging Port Available Available
AC Charging Time Available Available
Engine Displacement Available Available
EV Range Available Available

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Volkswagen Amarok wins with 57 pts vs 45 pts for Land Cruiser 79

In structured scoring, Amarok emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Land Cruiser 79 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Amarok edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Amarok 7 vs Land Cruiser 79 0. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Amarok 18, Land Cruiser 79 6. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Amarok 12, Land Cruiser 79 12. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Amarok 7, Land Cruiser 79 9. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Amarok 13, Land Cruiser 79 18. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Amarok edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Amarok scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Amarok and Land Cruiser 79 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amarok scores 13 vs 18.

Efficiency: Amarok scores 7 vs 0.

Safety: Amarok scores 18 vs 6.

Practicality: Amarok scores 7 vs 9.

Ownership: Amarok scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Amarok the advantage in this comparison.