Source type: Hyundai Kenya
Hyundai IONIQ 5 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 300
A proper head-to-head in Kenya — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Hyundai IONIQ 5
72.6 kWh Long RWD
Electric
Single-Speed Reduction Gear
Current
KES 9,250,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 160 kW
🔧 350 Nm
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 300
LC300 3.3D GX-R 10-AT
Diesel
10-Speed Automatic
Current
KES 25,450,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 225 kW
🔧 700 Nm
Decision summary
Hyundai IONIQ 5 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 300: the short answer
IONIQ 5 and Land Cruiser 300 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
IONIQ 5 starts KES 17,200,000 cheaper
IONIQ 5 from KES 8,250,000 · Land Cruiser 300 from KES 25,450,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | IONIQ 5 | Land Cruiser 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | IONIQ 5160 kW | Land Cruiser 300225 kW @ 4000 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | IONIQ 5350 Nm | Land Cruiser 300700 Nm @ 1600-2600 rpm |
| Engine Size | IONIQ 5Not Applicable | Land Cruiser 3003346 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | IONIQ 5Not Officially Disclosed | Land Cruiser 300Not Officially Disclosed |
| Ground Clearance | IONIQ 5160 mm | Land Cruiser 300235 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Toyota Kenya
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
IONIQ 5
Strengths
- Better fuel efficiency
- Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader
Land Cruiser 300
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- Lower fuel efficiency
- Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Published Practicality
Which One's Right for You?
IONIQ 5
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
Land Cruiser 300
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | IONIQ 5 | Land Cruiser 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Generation | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Facelift History | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Facelift Launched Since | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Facelift Version Ending | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Body Style | SUV | Station wagon |
| Model Year | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Segment | Kenya-market SUV | Kenya-market SUV |
| Vehicle Type | SUV | SUV |
| Spec | IONIQ 5 | Land Cruiser 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4635 mm | 4950 mm |
| Width | 1890 mm | 2010 mm |
| Height | 1605 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3000 mm | 2850 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 160 mm | 235 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 145 mm | 235 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | Not Applicable | 80 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | 527 l | 175 l |
| Kerb Weight | 1905 kg | 2563.88 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | 2430 kg | 3230 kg |
| Payload Capacity | 525 kg | 666 kg |
| Towing Capacity | 1600 kg | 3500 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Rows | 2 rows | 3 rows |
| Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 5.99 m | 5.9 m |
| Front Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Legroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
In depth: how these cars differ
This IONIQ 5 and Land Cruiser 300 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Kenya. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: IONIQ 5 67 vs Land Cruiser 300 98.
Efficiency index: IONIQ 5 90 vs Land Cruiser 300 42.
Safety-equipment index: IONIQ 5 94 vs Land Cruiser 300 90.
Practicality index: IONIQ 5 65 vs Land Cruiser 300 74.
Ownership-cover index: IONIQ 5 not separately scored vs Land Cruiser 300 not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
IONIQ 5 and Land Cruiser 300 image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Hyundai IONIQ 5
View 8 more IONIQ 5 images
Toyota Land Cruiser 300
View 8 more Land Cruiser 300 images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Land Cruiser 300 leads by 1 points
IONIQ 5 and Land Cruiser 300 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
Evidence leader
79
/100
Lead
1
points
Data
61%
source coverage
79
#1
Evidence leader
Land Cruiser 300
Performance
98
Efficiency
42
Safety
90
Practicality
74
Leads by 1 points
78
#2
IONIQ 5
Performance
67
Efficiency
90
Safety
94
Practicality
65
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Land Cruiser 300 +31
Efficiency
IONIQ 5 +48
Safety
IONIQ 5 +4
Practicality
Land Cruiser 300 +9
Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Land Cruiser 300
Performance
98/100
Efficiency
42/100
Safety
90/100
Practicality
74/100
IONIQ 5
Performance
67/100
Efficiency
90/100
Safety
94/100
Practicality
65/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Land Cruiser 300 leads. However, IONIQ 5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Kenya.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Kenya models and comparable body styles.
IONIQ 5 vs Land Cruiser 300 questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Kenya on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.