Source type: Toyota Uganda/CFAO model information; user-supplied AWD configuration and estimates require exact-grade confirmation
Toyota RAV4 vs Ford Territory
A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
VS
Ford Territory
Ambiente 1.8 EcoBoost 7DCT
Petrol
7-Speed DCT
Current
UGX 260,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 138 kW
🔧 318 Nm
Decision summary
Toyota RAV4 vs Ford Territory: the short answer
RAV4 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Territory remains close.
RAV4 starts UGX 50,000,000 cheaper
RAV4 from UGX 210,000,000 · Territory from UGX 260,000,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | RAV4 | Territory |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | RAV4Not Officially Disclosed | Territory138 kW @ 5200 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | RAV4Not Officially Disclosed | Territory318 Nm @ 1750-3000 rpm |
| Engine Size | RAV41987 cc | Territory1799 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | RAV412.5 km/l | TerritoryNot Officially Disclosed |
| Ground Clearance | RAV4190 mm | Territory190 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Ford Uganda / Motorcare exact grade specifications
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Specification evidence leader
RAV4
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Stronger listed safety equipment
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Published Practicality
Territory
Strengths
- Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Fewer listed safety features
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
General Use
Which One's Right for You?
RAV4
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Territory
- Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | RAV4 | Territory |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Generation | Uganda petrol RAV4 listing, kept separate from RAV4 HEV and used-import specifications. Exact supplied model year and equipment grade remain important. | Current market generation |
| Facelift History | No local facelift confirmed | Current-generation specification |
| Facelift Launched Since | Original current-generation version | 2023 |
| Facelift Version Ending | Current | Current |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Model Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Production Status | active | active |
| Segment | Family SUV | Compact SUV |
| Vehicle Type | Passenger SUV | Passenger SUV |
| Spec | RAV4 | Territory |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4600 mm | 4630 mm |
| Width | 1855 mm | 1935 mm |
| Height | 1685 mm | 1706 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2690 mm | 2726 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 190 mm | 190 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 175 mm | 160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 l | 60 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | 580 l | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Kerb Weight | 1570 kg | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | 2150 kg | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Payload Capacity | 580 kg | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Towing Capacity | 750 kg | 750 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Rows | 2 rows | 2 rows |
| Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 5.5 m | 5.5 m |
| Front Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | 1000 mm |
| Rear Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | Not Officially Disclosed | 1030 mm |
| Rear Legroom | Not Officially Disclosed | 880 mm |
In depth: how these cars differ
This RAV4 and Territory comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: RAV4 55 vs Territory 54.
Efficiency index: RAV4 52 vs Territory 52.
Safety-equipment index: RAV4 95 vs Territory 81.
Practicality index: RAV4 65 vs Territory 40.
Ownership-cover index: RAV4 not separately scored vs Territory not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
RAV4 and Territory image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Toyota RAV4
View 8 more RAV4 images
Ford Territory
View 8 more Territory images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
RAV4 leads by 10 points
RAV4 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Territory remains close.
Evidence leader
67
/100
Lead
10
points
Data
57%
source coverage
67
#1
Evidence leader
RAV4
Performance
55
Efficiency
52
Safety
95
Practicality
65
Leads by 10 points
57
#2
Territory
Performance
54
Efficiency
52
Safety
81
Practicality
40
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
RAV4 +1
Efficiency
Level
Safety
RAV4 +14
Practicality
RAV4 +25
Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
RAV4
Performance
55/100
Efficiency
52/100
Safety
95/100
Practicality
65/100
Territory
Performance
54/100
Efficiency
52/100
Safety
81/100
Practicality
40/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, RAV4 leads. However, Territory may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Uganda models and comparable body styles.
RAV4 vs Territory questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.