Source type: Hyundai Uganda / Motorcare quotation catalogue and model specifications
Hyundai Palisade vs Toyota Rumion
A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Hyundai Palisade
PALISADE 2.5L PETROL 4x4 8AT GLS
Petrol
8-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 220,000,000
ex-showroom
🔧 422 Nm
⛽ 15.0 km/l
VS
Toyota Rumion
Rumion 1.5L Petrol 4AT DELUXE
Petrol
4-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 118,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW
🔧 138 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
Decision summary
Hyundai Palisade vs Toyota Rumion: the short answer
Palisade holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Rumion.
Rumion starts UGX 102,000,000 cheaper
Palisade from UGX 220,000,000 · Rumion from UGX 118,000,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | Palisade | Rumion |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | PalisadeNot Officially Disclosed | Rumion77 kW @ 6000 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | Palisade422 Nm @ 1700-4000 rpm | Rumion138 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Engine Size | Palisade2497 cc | Rumion1462 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | Palisade15.0 km/l | Rumion12.5 km/l |
| Ground Clearance | Palisade187 mm | Rumion180 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Toyota Uganda/CFAO specifications; user-supplied estimates for remaining fields
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Specification evidence leader
Palisade
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Better fuel efficiency
- Stronger listed safety equipment
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Published Efficiency
Published Practicality
Rumion
Strengths
- Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Lower fuel efficiency
- Fewer listed safety features
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
General Use
Which One's Right for You?
Palisade
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Rumion
- Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | Palisade | Rumion |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | 2023 | 2022 |
| Generation | Current market generation | Seven-seat Rumion MPV introduced in Uganda in November 2022 |
| Facelift History | Current-generation specification | No local facelift confirmed |
| Facelift Launched Since | 2023 | Original current-generation version |
| Facelift Version Ending | Current | Current |
| Body Style | SUV | MPV |
| Model Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Production Status | active | active |
| Segment | SUV | Seven-seat compact MPV |
| Vehicle Type | Passenger SUV | Passenger MPV |
| Spec | Palisade | Rumion |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 5060 mm | 4395 mm |
| Width | 1980 mm | 1735 mm |
| Height | Not Officially Disclosed | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2970 mm | 2740 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 187 mm | 180 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 160 mm | 170 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 l | 45 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | Not Officially Disclosed | 153 l |
| Kerb Weight | Not Officially Disclosed | 1160 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | Not Officially Disclosed | 1730 kg |
| Payload Capacity | Not Officially Disclosed | 580 kg |
| Towing Capacity | 1500 kg | 750 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 8 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Rows | 3 rows | 3 rows |
| Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 5.97 m | 5.2 m |
| Front Headroom | 1054 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Headroom | 1043 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | 1052 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Legroom | 1092 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
In depth: how these cars differ
This Palisade and Rumion comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: Palisade 75 vs Rumion 35.
Efficiency index: Palisade 60 vs Rumion 52.
Safety-equipment index: Palisade 61 vs Rumion 50.
Practicality index: Palisade 71 vs Rumion 54.
Ownership-cover index: Palisade not separately scored vs Rumion not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
Palisade and Rumion image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Hyundai Palisade
View 8 more Palisade images
Toyota Rumion
View 8 more Rumion images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Palisade leads by 20 points
Palisade holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Rumion.
Evidence leader
67
/100
Lead
20
points
Data
60%
source coverage
67
#1
Evidence leader
Palisade
Performance
75
Efficiency
60
Safety
61
Practicality
71
Leads by 20 points
47
#2
Rumion
Performance
35
Efficiency
52
Safety
50
Practicality
54
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Palisade +40
Efficiency
Palisade +8
Safety
Palisade +11
Practicality
Palisade +17
Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Palisade
Performance
75/100
Efficiency
60/100
Safety
61/100
Practicality
71/100
Rumion
Performance
35/100
Efficiency
52/100
Safety
50/100
Practicality
54/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Palisade leads. However, Rumion may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Uganda models and comparable body styles.
Palisade vs Rumion questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.