Toyota Land Cruiser 79 vs Hyundai Palisade

A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 in Uganda

Toyota Land Cruiser 79

LC79 4.2L Pick-up Double Cab 5-MT 4x4 Diesel 5-Speed Manual Current
UGX 360,000,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 96 kW 🔧 285 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
VS
Hyundai Palisade in Uganda

Hyundai Palisade

PALISADE 2.5L PETROL 4x4 8AT GLS Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
UGX 220,000,000 ex-showroom
🔧 422 Nm ⛽ 15.0 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 vs Hyundai Palisade: the short answer

Palisade has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser 79 remains close.

Palisade starts UGX 140,000,000 cheaper Land Cruiser 79 from UGX 360,000,000 · Palisade from UGX 220,000,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Land Cruiser 79 Palisade
Maximum Power Land Cruiser 7996 kW @ 3800 rpm PalisadeNot Officially Disclosed
Maximum Torque Land Cruiser 79285 Nm @ 2200 rpm Palisade422 Nm @ 1700-4000 rpm
Engine Size Land Cruiser 794164 cc Palisade2497 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Land Cruiser 7912.5 km/l Palisade15.0 km/l
Ground Clearance Land Cruiser 79235 mm Palisade187 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Land Cruiser 79

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

Palisade

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Land Cruiser 79

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Palisade

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Land Cruiser 79 Palisade
Model Introduced Year 2023 2023
Generation Uganda-listed 70 Series LC79 double cab with 4.2-litre 1HZ diesel and five-speed manual; not the later 2.8-litre automatic specification. Current market generation
Facelift History No local facelift confirmed Current-generation specification
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2023
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Pick-up double cab SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Heavy-duty double-cab pickup SUV
Vehicle Type Pickup Passenger SUV
Spec Land Cruiser 79 Palisade
Length 5095 mm 5060 mm
Width 1790 mm 1980 mm
Height 1960 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Wheelbase 3180 mm 2970 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 235 mm 187 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 220 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 130 l 72 l
Boot/Cargo Space 1000 l Not Officially Disclosed
Kerb Weight 2280 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3200 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Payload Capacity 1120 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 8 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 3 rows
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.3 m 5.97 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 1054 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 1043 mm
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1052 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1092 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Land Cruiser 79 and Palisade comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Land Cruiser 79 51 vs Palisade 75.

Efficiency index: Land Cruiser 79 54 vs Palisade 60.

Safety-equipment index: Land Cruiser 79 44 vs Palisade 61.

Practicality index: Land Cruiser 79 82 vs Palisade 71.

Ownership-cover index: Land Cruiser 79 not separately scored vs Palisade not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Palisade leads by 9 points

Palisade has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser 79 remains close.

Evidence leader 67 /100
Lead 9 points
Data 60% source coverage
67
#1 Evidence leader

Palisade

60% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 75 Check Efficiency 60
Performance 75
Efficiency 60
Safety 61
Practicality 71
Leads by 9 points
58
#2

Land Cruiser 79

74% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 82 Check Safety 44
Performance 51
Efficiency 54
Safety 44
Practicality 82
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Palisade +24 Efficiency Palisade +6 Safety Palisade +17 Practicality Land Cruiser 79 +11

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Palisade

Performance 75/100
Efficiency 60/100
Safety 61/100
Practicality 71/100

Land Cruiser 79

Performance 51/100
Efficiency 54/100
Safety 44/100
Practicality 82/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Hyundai Palisade leads the specification evidence index with 67 pts vs 58 pts for Land Cruiser 79

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Palisade leads. However, Land Cruiser 79 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.

Land Cruiser 79 vs Palisade questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.