Toyota Hilux vs Toyota Land Cruiser 78

A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota Hilux in Uganda

Toyota Hilux

2.8GD Active Double Cab 6-AT 4x4 Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
UGX 272,000,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 500 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 78 in Uganda

Toyota Land Cruiser 78

LC78 4.2L Hard Top 5-MT 4x4 Diesel 5-Speed Manual Current
UGX 370,000,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 96 kW 🔧 285 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota Hilux vs Toyota Land Cruiser 78: the short answer

Hilux has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser 78 remains close.

Hilux starts UGX 165,400,000 cheaper Hilux from UGX 204,600,000 · Land Cruiser 78 from UGX 370,000,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Hilux Land Cruiser 78
Maximum Power Hilux150 kW @ 3000-3400 rpm Land Cruiser 7896 kW @ 3800 rpm
Maximum Torque Hilux500 Nm @ 1600-2800 rpm Land Cruiser 78285 Nm @ 2200 rpm
Engine Size Hilux2755 cc Land Cruiser 784164 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Hilux12.5 km/l Land Cruiser 7812.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Hilux286 mm Land Cruiser 78235 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Hilux

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Land Cruiser 78

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Hilux

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Land Cruiser 78

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Hilux Land Cruiser 78
Model Introduced Year 2023 2023
Generation Uganda-listed Hilux Active double cab with the 2.8-litre diesel and six-speed automatic. Uganda-listed LC78 hard top with 4.2-litre 1HZ diesel, five-speed manual and thirteen-seat catalogue configuration.
Facelift History No local facelift confirmed No local facelift confirmed
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Pick-up double cab Hard top
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Double-cab pickup Long-wheelbase heavy-duty 4x4
Vehicle Type Pickup Hard-top utility vehicle
Spec Hilux Land Cruiser 78
Length 5325 mm 4990 mm
Width 1855 mm 1770 mm
Height 1815 mm 2115 mm
Wheelbase 3085 mm 2980 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 286 mm 235 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 271 mm 220 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 l 180 l
Boot/Cargo Space 1000 l 1000 l
Kerb Weight 2085 kg 2230 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2910 kg 3200 kg
Payload Capacity 825 kg 970 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 13 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows Not Officially Disclosed
Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.4 m 6.8 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This Hilux and Land Cruiser 78 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Hilux 73 vs Land Cruiser 78 51.

Efficiency index: Hilux 54 vs Land Cruiser 78 54.

Safety-equipment index: Hilux 59 vs Land Cruiser 78 44.

Practicality index: Hilux 80 vs Land Cruiser 78 87.

Ownership-cover index: Hilux not separately scored vs Land Cruiser 78 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Hilux leads by 8 points

Hilux has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser 78 remains close.

Evidence leader 67 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 75% source coverage
67
#1 Evidence leader

Hilux

75% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 80 Check Efficiency 54
Performance 73
Efficiency 54
Safety 59
Practicality 80
Leads by 8 points
59
#2

Land Cruiser 78

74% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 87 Check Safety 44
Performance 51
Efficiency 54
Safety 44
Practicality 87
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Hilux +22 Efficiency Level Safety Hilux +15 Practicality Land Cruiser 78 +7

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Hilux

Performance 73/100
Efficiency 54/100
Safety 59/100
Practicality 80/100

Land Cruiser 78

Performance 51/100
Efficiency 54/100
Safety 44/100
Practicality 87/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota Hilux leads the specification evidence index with 67 pts vs 59 pts for Land Cruiser 78

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Hilux leads. However, Land Cruiser 78 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.

Hilux vs Land Cruiser 78 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.