Nissan Navara vs Ford Territory

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Nissan Navara in South Africa

Nissan Navara

ZAR 480,000 – 690,000
⚡ 140 hp
🔧 450 Nm
⛽ 13.5 km/l
VS
Ford Territory in South Africa

Ford Territory

ZAR 520,000 – 610,000
⚡ 140 hp
🔧 320 Nm
⛽ 13.5 km/l

Quick Winners

Performance Navara
Mileage Territory
🔑 Ownership Navara

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

Territory

68
out of 100
6
point lead
Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Navara

62
out of 100

Executive Summary

Both Navara and Territory are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Navara +2 pts
Efficiency Territory +8 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality Territory +4 pts
Ownership Navara +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 16/20

Navara

Performance 15/20
Efficiency 0/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 20/20

Pros & Cons

Navara

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving
🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Navara

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Territory

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Navara Territory
Ground Clearance 225 190
Wheelbase 3150 2716
Length 5330 4630
Width 1850 1935
Height 1810 1706
Kerb Weight 1985 1635
Gross Vehicle Weight 3150 2150
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 0 448
Towing Capacity 3500 1200
Specification Navara Territory
Engine 2.5L Turbo Diesel 1.8L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled Inline 4 Turbocharged
Displacement 2488 1798
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 140 140
Torque 450 320
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 185 185
0-100 km/h 10.5 9.8

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Territory wins this comparison with 68 points vs 62 points for Navara.

In structured scoring, Territory emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Navara may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Territory performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Navara scores 0 while Territory scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Navara scores 18 and Territory scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Navara scores 20 versus Territory scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Navara 9 and Territory 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Navara scoring 15 compared to Territory scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Territory may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Territory performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Territory the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Navara and Territory in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Navara scores 15 vs 13.

Efficiency: Navara scores 0 vs 8.

Safety: Navara scores 18 vs 18.

Practicality: Navara scores 9 vs 13.

Ownership: Navara scores 20 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Territory the advantage in this comparison.