Hyundai i30 vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Hyundai i30 in South Africa

Hyundai i30

1.0T Fluid Petrol manual
468,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 88 kW (118 hp)
🔧 172 Nm
⛽ 16.9 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Tie
Mileage Puma
🔑 Ownership i30

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Puma

61
/ 100
+5
pts
#2

i30

56
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Both i30 and Puma are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Equal
Efficiency Puma +9 pts
Safety Puma +2 pts
Practicality Puma +2 pts
Ownership i30 +8 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

i30

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 0/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 20/20

Pros & Cons

i30

Pros
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: General Use
🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

i30

  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Puma

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification i30 Puma
Length 4340 4186
Width 1795 1805
Height 1455 1531
Wheelbase 2650 2594
Ground Clearance 135 170
Kerb Weight 1285 1325
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 395 456
Gross Vehicle Weight - 1775
Towing Capacity - 1200
Front Track Width - 1541
Rear Track Width - 1534
Turning Radius - 5.4
Specification i30 Puma
Engine 1.0 T-GDI Turbo 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type Petrol Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement 998 999
Cylinders 3 3
Power 88 92
Torque 172 170
Fuel System Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Yes Single Turbo
Top Speed 190 185
0-100 km/h 10.8 10.5
Power @ RPM @ 5500 rpm 6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM @ 1500 rpm 2000-4500 rpm
Valves per Cylinder - 4
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Puma wins with 61 pts vs 56 pts for i30

In structured scoring, Puma emerges as the stronger overall package. However, i30 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Puma performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

i30 scores 0 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, i30 scores 18 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

i30 scores 20 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives i30 10 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows i30 scoring 8 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Puma may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Puma performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Puma the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between i30 and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: i30 scores 8 vs 8.

Efficiency: i30 scores 0 vs 9.

Safety: i30 scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: i30 scores 10 vs 12.

Ownership: i30 scores 20 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Puma the advantage in this comparison.