Honda CR-V vs Toyota Fortuner

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda CR-V in South Africa

Honda CR-V

ZAR 689,900 – 819,900
⚡ 190 hp
🔧 240 Nm
⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
Toyota Fortuner in South Africa

Toyota Fortuner

ZAR 620,000 – 865,000
⚡ 110 hp
🔧 400 Nm
⛽ 13.2 km/l

Quick Winners

Performance CR-V
Mileage CR-V
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

CR-V

67
out of 100
10
point lead
Moderate difference between the two models.

Fortuner

57
out of 100

Executive Summary

CR-V has a slight advantage, but Fortuner remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance CR-V +2 pts
Efficiency CR-V +8 pts
Safety Fortuner +2 pts
Practicality CR-V +2 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

CR-V

Performance 15/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 14/20
Ownership 12/20

Fortuner

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 0/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

CR-V

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Fortuner

Pros
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: General Use

Who Should Buy Which?

CR-V

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Fortuner

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specification Comparison

Specification CR-V Fortuner
Ground Clearance 198 225
Wheelbase 2700 2745
Length 4690 4795
Width 1860 1855
Height 1690 1835
Kerb Weight 1580 2010
Gross Vehicle Weight 2100 2735
Seating Capacity 5 7
Boot Space 522 296
Towing Capacity 1500 2800
Specification CR-V Fortuner
Engine 1.5L Turbo Petrol 2.4L Turbo Diesel
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement 1498 2393
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 190 110
Torque 240 400
Fuel System Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Top Speed 200 180
0-100 km/h 9.5 11.8

Final Verdict

🏆 Honda CR-V wins this comparison with 67 points vs 57 points for Fortuner.

In structured scoring, CR-V emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Fortuner may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, CR-V performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

CR-V scores 8 while Fortuner scores 0 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, CR-V scores 18 and Fortuner scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

CR-V scores 12 versus Fortuner scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives CR-V 14 and Fortuner 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows CR-V scoring 15 compared to Fortuner scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest CR-V may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. CR-V performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives CR-V the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between CR-V and Fortuner in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: CR-V scores 15 vs 13.

Efficiency: CR-V scores 8 vs 0.

Safety: CR-V scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: CR-V scores 14 vs 12.

Ownership: CR-V scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives CR-V the advantage in this comparison.