Volkswagen Amarok vs Ford Everest

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Volkswagen Amarok

Change Car A

ZAR 690,000 – 980,000

⚡ 125 hp

🔧 400 Nm

⛽ 12.8 km/l

Ford Everest

Change Car B

ZAR 750,000 – 900,000

⚡ 154 hp

🔧 500 Nm

⛽ 13.2 km/l

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance Everest

⛽ Mileage Amarok

🔑 Ownership Everest

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

Everest

out of 100

point lead

Moderate difference between the two models.

Amarok

out of 100

Executive Summary

Everest has a slight advantage, but Amarok remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Everest +4 pts

Efficiency Amarok +1 pts

Safety Everest +2 pts

Practicality Everest +5 pts

Ownership Everest +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Performance 17/20

Efficiency 6/20

Safety 20/20

Practicality 12/20

Ownership 16/20

Amarok

Performance 13/20

Efficiency 7/20

Safety 18/20

Practicality 7/20

Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Amarok

Pros

Better fuel efficiency

Cons

Less powerful engine setup
Less comprehensive safety features
Less practical in daily usage
Shorter warranty coverage

Best For: Fuel Efficiency

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Pros

More powerful engine output
Stronger safety package
More practical for daily use
Better long-term ownership value

Cons

Lower fuel efficiency

Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Amarok

Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Everest

Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
Large families needing more practicality and usability
Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification	Amarok	Everest
Ground Clearance	192	225
Wheelbase	3097	2900
Length	5254	4914
Width	1944	1923
Height	1834	1842
Kerb Weight	2095	2400
Gross Vehicle Weight	3150	3150
Seating Capacity	5	7
Boot Space	0	259
Towing Capacity	3500	3500

Specification	Amarok	Everest
Engine	2.0L TDI Turbo Diesel	2.0L Bi-Turbo Diesel
Engine Type	Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled	Inline 4 Twin Turbocharged
Displacement	1968	1996
Cylinders	4	4
Valves per Cylinder	4	4
Power	125	154
Torque	400	500
Fuel System	Common Rail Direct Injection	Common Rail Direct Injection
Turbocharger	Twin Turbo	-
Top Speed	180	190
0-100 km/h	10.5	9.8

Specification	Amarok	Everest
Transmission	8-Speed Automatic	10-Speed Automatic
Drive Type	4Motion AWD	4x4
Drivetrain Layout	Selectable 4WD	Selectable 4WD
LSD Available	Electronic Rear Differential Lock	Electronic
Transfer Case	High and Low Range	Low Range Available

Specification	Amarok	Everest
Traction Control	Standard	Standard
Electronic Stability Control	Standard	Standard
Airbags	6	7
ABS	Standard	Standard
Brake Assist	Standard	Standard
Hill Descent Control	Standard	Standard
ISOFIX Mounts	Standard	Standard
Child Safety Lock	Standard	Standard
Engine Immobiliser	Standard	Standard
Alarm System	Standard	-
Tyre Pressure Monitor	Standard	Standard

Specification	Amarok	Everest
Claimed Mileage	12.8	13.2
City Mileage	9	8
Highway Mileage	13	12
Fuel Tank Capacity	80	80
Emission Standard	Euro 5	Euro 5

Specification	Amarok	Everest
CO2 Emissions	225	198
Start Stop System	Yes	Standard
Hybrid System Type	None	Not Applicable

Specification	Amarok	Everest
Cruise Control	Standard	Standard
Adaptive Cruise Control	Not Available	Standard
Lane Keep Assist	Not Available	Standard
Blind Spot Monitoring	Not Available	Standard
Rear Cross Traffic Alert	Not Available	Standard
Parking Sensors	Front and Rear	Front and Rear
Rear View Camera	Standard	Standard
360 Degree Camera	Not Available	Standard
Autonomous Emergency Braking	Not Available	Standard

Specification	Amarok	Everest
Seat Material	Fabric	Leather
Seat Adjustment	Manual	8-Way Power Driver
Heated Seats	Not Available	Front
Ventilated Seats	Not Available	Not Available
Steering Type	Power Assisted	Electric Power Assisted
Steering Adjustment	Tilt and Telescopic	Tilt and Telescopic
Ambient Lighting	Not Available	Standard

Specification	Amarok	Everest
Climate Control	Automatic	Dual Zone Automatic
Power Windows	Front and Rear	Standard
Keyless Entry	Remote Key	Smart Key
Push Button Start	Not Available	Standard
Wireless Charging	Not Available	Standard
Sunroof	Not Available	Panoramic
Electric Tailgate	Not Available	Hands-free

Specification	Amarok	Everest
Infotainment Screen	8-inch Touchscreen	12-inch Touchscreen
Apple CarPlay	Standard	Wireless
Android Auto	Standard	Wireless
Bluetooth Connectivity	Standard	Standard
USB Ports	Front and Rear	-
Number of Speakers	6	10
Navigation System	Optional	Built-in
Digital Instrument Cluster	Not Available	-

Specification	Amarok	Everest
LED Headlamps	Halogen Projector	Matrix LED
Daytime Running Lamps	LED	LED
Fog Lamps	Front	LED
Roof Rails	Not Available	Black
Alloy Wheel Design	17-inch Alloy	20-inch Alloy

Specification	Amarok	Everest
Approach Angle	29	30
Departure Angle	24	26
Wading Depth	500	800
Terrain Modes	Offroad Mode	Normal
Locking Differential	Electronic Rear Lock	Electronic Rear

Specification	Amarok	Everest
Tyre Size	255/65 R17	255/55 R20
Wheel Type	Alloy	Alloy
Front Brake Type	Ventilated Disc	Vented Disc
Rear Brake Type	Drum	Disc

Specification	Amarok	Everest
Front Suspension	Double Wishbone	Double Wishbone
Rear Suspension	Leaf Spring	Multi-link Coil Spring
Chassis Type	Ladder Frame	Ladder Frame

Specification	Amarok	Everest
Service Interval	15000 km / 12 months	15000 km / 12 months
Approx Service Cost	Moderate	Moderate
Battery Warranty	24 Months	2 Years

Specification	Amarok	Everest
Warranty Years	3	4
Warranty Kilometers	120000	120000
Roadside Assistance	3 Years	4 Years

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Everest wins this comparison with 71 points vs 57 points for Amarok.

In structured scoring, Everest emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Amarok may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Everest performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amarok scores 7 while Everest scores 6 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amarok scores 18 and Everest scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amarok scores 12 versus Everest scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amarok 7 and Everest 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amarok scoring 13 compared to Everest scoring 17, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Everest may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Everest performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Everest the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amarok and Everest in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amarok scores 13 vs 17.

Efficiency: Amarok scores 7 vs 6.

Safety: Amarok scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: Amarok scores 7 vs 12.

Ownership: Amarok scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Everest the advantage in this comparison.

Volkswagen Amarok vs Ford Everest

Volkswagen Amarok

Ford Everest

Quick Winners

Overall Comparison Score

Everest

Amarok

Executive Summary

Key Differences At A Glance

Category Score Breakdown

Everest

Amarok

Pros & Cons

Amarok

Everest

Who Should Buy Which?

Amarok

Everest

Full Specification Comparison

Final Verdict

Related Comparisons

People Also Compare

Frequently Asked Questions

Detailed Comparison Analysis