Ford Territory vs Nissan X-Trail

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Territory in South Africa

Ford Territory

ZAR 520,000 – 610,000
⚡ 140 hp
🔧 320 Nm
⛽ 13.5 km/l
VS
Nissan X-Trail in South Africa

Nissan X-Trail

ZAR 610,000 – 730,000
⚡ 126 hp
🔧 233 Nm
⛽ 13.8 km/l

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance Territory
⛽ Mileage Territory
🔑 Ownership X-Trail

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

Territory

68
out of 100
4
point lead
Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

X-Trail

64
out of 100

Executive Summary

Both Territory and X-Trail are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Territory +2 pts
Efficiency Territory +8 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality X-Trail +2 pts
Ownership X-Trail +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 16/20

X-Trail

Performance 11/20
Efficiency 0/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 15/20
Ownership 20/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency

X-Trail

Pros
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Territory

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

X-Trail

  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Territory X-Trail
Ground Clearance 190 210
Wheelbase 2716 2705
Length 4630 4680
Width 1935 1840
Height 1706 1725
Kerb Weight 1635 1635
Gross Vehicle Weight 2150 2230
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 448 565
Towing Capacity 1200 1800
Specification Territory X-Trail
Engine 1.8L Turbocharged Petrol 2.5L Naturally Aspirated Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Inline 4-cylinder DOHC
Displacement 1798 2488
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 140 126
Torque 320 233
Fuel System Direct Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 185 200
0-100 km/h 9.8 10.2

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Territory wins this comparison with 68 points vs 64 points for X-Trail.

In structured scoring, Territory emerges as the stronger overall package. However, X-Trail may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related Comparisons

See how similar cars stack up against each other.

Territory
Territory
VS
EcoSport
EcoSport
Territory vs EcoSport →
Territory
Territory
VS
Everest
Everest
Territory vs Everest →
Territory
Territory
VS
Ranger
Ranger
Territory vs Ranger →
Territory
Territory
VS
Amaze
Amaze
Territory vs Amaze →
Territory
Territory
VS
CR-V
CR-V
Territory vs CR-V →
Territory
Territory
VS
Civic RS
Civic RS
Territory vs Civic RS →
X-Trail
X-Trail
VS
EcoSport
EcoSport
X-Trail vs EcoSport →
X-Trail
X-Trail
VS
Everest
Everest
X-Trail vs Everest →

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Territory
Territory
VS
EcoSport
EcoSport
Territory vs EcoSport →
Territory
Territory
VS
Everest
Everest
Territory vs Everest →
Territory
Territory
VS
CR-V
CR-V
Territory vs CR-V →
Territory
Territory
VS
Elevate
Elevate
Territory vs Elevate →
Territory
Territory
VS
HR-V
HR-V
Territory vs HR-V →
Territory
Territory
VS
MU-X
MU-X
Territory vs MU-X →

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Territory performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Territory scores 8 while X-Trail scores 0 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Territory scores 18 and X-Trail scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Territory scores 16 versus X-Trail scoring 20. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Territory 13 and X-Trail 15, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Territory scoring 13 compared to X-Trail scoring 11, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Territory may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Territory performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Territory the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Territory and X-Trail in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Territory scores 13 vs 11.

Efficiency: Territory scores 8 vs 0.

Safety: Territory scores 18 vs 18.

Practicality: Territory scores 13 vs 15.

Ownership: Territory scores 16 vs 20.

Final structured scoring gives Territory the advantage in this comparison.