Ford Puma vs Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
VS
Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace in South Africa

Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace

2.0 TSI 162kW R-Line 4Motion DSG Petrol Automatic
ZAR 934,700 ex-showroom
⚡ 162 kW (217 hp)
🔧 350 Nm
⛽ 13.0 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Tiguan Allspace
Mileage Puma
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Tiguan Allspace

71
/ 100
+10
pts
#2

Puma

61
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Tiguan Allspace has a slight advantage, but Puma remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Tiguan Allspace +7 pts
Efficiency Puma +1 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality Tiguan Allspace +4 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Tiguan Allspace

Performance 15/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 16/20
Ownership 12/20

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Puma

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Tiguan Allspace

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Puma

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Tiguan Allspace

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Puma Tiguan Allspace
Ground Clearance 170 197
Wheelbase 2594 2790
Length 4186 4735
Width 1805 1839
Height 1531 1685
Kerb Weight 1325 1740
Gross Vehicle Weight 1775 2240
Seating Capacity 5 7
Boot Space 456 615
Towing Capacity 1200 1800
Front Track Width 1541 -
Rear Track Width 1534 -
Turning Radius 5.4 -
Specification Puma Tiguan Allspace
Engine 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid 2.0L TSI Petrol
Engine Type Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid Inline 4-cylinder EA888 TSI
Displacement 999 1984
Cylinders 3 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 92 162
Power @ RPM 6000 rpm 5100 rpm
Torque 170 350
Torque @ RPM 2000-4500 rpm 1700 rpm
Fuel System Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Single Turbo Turbocharged
Top Speed 185 230
0-100 km/h 10.5 6.5
Compression Ratio 10.5:1 -
Engine Position Front Transverse -

Final Verdict

🏆 Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace wins with 71 pts vs 61 pts for Puma

In structured scoring, Tiguan Allspace emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Puma may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Tiguan Allspace performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Puma scores 9 while Tiguan Allspace scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Puma scores 20 and Tiguan Allspace scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Puma scores 12 versus Tiguan Allspace scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Puma 12 and Tiguan Allspace 16, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Puma scoring 8 compared to Tiguan Allspace scoring 15, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Tiguan Allspace may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Tiguan Allspace performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Tiguan Allspace the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Puma and Tiguan Allspace in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Puma scores 8 vs 15.

Efficiency: Puma scores 9 vs 8.

Safety: Puma scores 20 vs 20.

Practicality: Puma scores 12 vs 16.

Ownership: Puma scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Tiguan Allspace the advantage in this comparison.