Toyota Land Cruiser 79 vs Ford Mustang

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 79

4.0 V6 Double Cab MT Petrol Manual
ZAR 870,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW 🔧 381 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
VS
Ford Mustang in South Africa

Ford Mustang

5.0 GT Premium Convertible Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 1,449,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 338 kW 🔧 515 Nm ⛽ 9.1 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Mustang
Fuel Economy Mustang
🛡 Safety Mustang
📦 Practicality Mustang
🔑 Ownership Tie
Land Cruiser 79 starts ZAR 989900 cheaper Land Cruiser 79 from ZAR 706,200 · Mustang from ZAR 989,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Land Cruiser 79 Mustang
Engine Power 202 338
Torque 381 515
Engine Size 3956 4951
Claimed Mileage 13.0 9.1
Ground Clearance 235 134
Boot Space Not Available 408
Airbags 2 8
Kerb Weight 2050 1815
Seating Capacity Available Available
Warranty 3 3

= leads in this spec

The Overall Score — Here's How They Stack Up

🏆 Winner
#1

Mustang

67
/ 100
+22
pts
#2

Land Cruiser 79

45
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

The Bottom Line

Mustang holds a noticeable edge over Land Cruiser 79, especially in key ownership areas.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Mustang +2 pts
Efficiency Mustang +5 pts
Safety Mustang +14 pts
Practicality Mustang +1 pts
Ownership Equal

Score Breakdown by Category

🏆 Overall Winner

Mustang

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 5/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

Land Cruiser 79

Performance 18/20
Efficiency 0/20
Safety 6/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 12/20

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Land Cruiser 79

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: General Use
🏆 Overall Winner

Mustang

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

Land Cruiser 79

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Mustang

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Land Cruiser 79 Mustang
Ground Clearance 235 134
Wheelbase 3085 2720
Length 5270 4788
Width 1855 1916
Height 1855 1381
Kerb Weight 2050 1815
Gross Vehicle Weight 3100 2245
Seating Capacity 5 4
Boot Space Not Available 408
Towing Capacity 3500 Not Rated
Turning Radius 6.4 6.1
Number of Doors 5 5
Boot Space Seats Folded 1500 1500
Front Track Width 1550 1617
Rear Track Width 1540 1607
Load Bed Length Available Available
Load Bed Width Available Available
Front Legroom Available Available
Rear Legroom Available Available
Front Headroom Available Available
Rear Headroom Available Available
Front Shoulder Room Available Available
Rear Shoulder Room Available Available
Max Payload Available Available
Boot Volume Available Available
Doors Available Available
Seats Available Available
Front Overhang Available Available
Fuel Tank Capacity Available Available
Rear Overhang Available Available
Spec Land Cruiser 79 Mustang
Engine 1GR-FE 5.0L Coyote V8 Petrol
Engine Type V6 V8 DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Displacement 3956 4951
Cylinders 6 8
Valves per Cylinder 24 4
Power 202 338
Torque 381 515
Fuel System Multi-Point EFI Direct Injection
Top Speed 175 250
0-100 km/h 9.5 4.6
Power @ RPM 5600 rpm 7300 rpm
Torque @ RPM 4400 rpm 4250 rpm
Turbocharger No Not Available
Cylinder Layout Inline 4 (I4) Inline 4 (I4)
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Turbocharged
Engine Code Standard Standard
Compression Ratio 10.5:1 12.0:1
Cylinder Bore 82.0 82.0
Piston Stroke 92.0 92.0
Fuel Grade Required Petrol Petrol
Engine Position Available Front Longitudinal
Engine Oil Capacity Available Available
Power 150 150
Variable Valve Timing Available Available
Maximum Engine RPM Available Available
Engine Type Config Available Available
0–100 km/h Available Available
Battery Capacity Available Available
Charging Port Available Available
AC Charging Time Available Available
Engine Displacement Available Available
EV Range Available Available

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Ford Mustang wins with 67 pts vs 45 pts for Land Cruiser 79

In structured scoring, Mustang emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Land Cruiser 79 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Mustang edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Land Cruiser 79 0 vs Mustang 5. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Land Cruiser 79 6, Mustang 20. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Land Cruiser 79 12, Mustang 12. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Land Cruiser 79 9, Mustang 10. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Land Cruiser 79 18, Mustang 20. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Mustang edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Mustang scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Land Cruiser 79 and Mustang in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Land Cruiser 79 scores 18 vs 20.

Efficiency: Land Cruiser 79 scores 0 vs 5.

Safety: Land Cruiser 79 scores 6 vs 20.

Practicality: Land Cruiser 79 scores 9 vs 10.

Ownership: Land Cruiser 79 scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Mustang the advantage in this comparison.