Hyundai Grand i10 vs Ford Puma

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Hyundai Grand i10 in South Africa

Hyundai Grand i10

1.2 Fluid Petrol manual
242,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 61 kW (82 hp)
🔧 114 Nm
⛽ 16.5 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW (123 hp)
🔧 170 Nm
⛽ 16.4 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Puma
Mileage Puma
🔑 Ownership Grand i10

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Puma

61
/ 100
+9
pts
#2

Grand i10

52
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Executive Summary

Puma has a slight advantage, but Grand i10 remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Puma +3 pts
Efficiency Puma +9 pts
Safety Puma +2 pts
Practicality Puma +3 pts
Ownership Grand i10 +8 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Grand i10

Performance 5/20
Efficiency 0/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 20/20

Pros & Cons

Grand i10

Pros
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: General Use
🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Grand i10

  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Puma

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Grand i10 Puma
Length 3665 4186
Width 1660 1805
Height 1520 1531
Wheelbase 2385 2594
Ground Clearance 170 170
Kerb Weight 975 1325
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 235 456
Gross Vehicle Weight - 1775
Towing Capacity - 1200
Front Track Width - 1541
Rear Track Width - 1534
Turning Radius - 5.4
Specification Grand i10 Puma
Engine 1.2 MPI DOHC 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type Petrol Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement 1197 999
Cylinders 4 3
Power 61 92
Torque 114 170
Fuel System Multi-Point Fuel Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger No Single Turbo
Top Speed 171 185
0-100 km/h 12.8 10.5
Power @ RPM @ 6300 rpm 6000 rpm
Torque @ RPM @ 4200 rpm 2000-4500 rpm
Valves per Cylinder - 4
Compression Ratio - 10.5:1
Engine Position - Front Transverse

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Puma wins with 61 pts vs 52 pts for Grand i10

In structured scoring, Puma emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Grand i10 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Puma performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Grand i10 scores 0 while Puma scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Grand i10 scores 18 and Puma scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Grand i10 scores 20 versus Puma scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Grand i10 9 and Puma 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Grand i10 scoring 5 compared to Puma scoring 8, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Puma may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Puma performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Puma the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Grand i10 and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Grand i10 scores 5 vs 8.

Efficiency: Grand i10 scores 0 vs 9.

Safety: Grand i10 scores 18 vs 20.

Practicality: Grand i10 scores 9 vs 12.

Ownership: Grand i10 scores 20 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Puma the advantage in this comparison.