Volkswagen Amarok vs Ford Territory

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Volkswagen Amarok in South Africa

Volkswagen Amarok

ZAR 690,000 – 980,000
⚡ 125 hp
🔧 400 Nm
⛽ 12.8 km/l
VS
Ford Territory in South Africa

Ford Territory

ZAR 520,000 – 610,000
⚡ 140 hp
🔧 320 Nm
⛽ 13.5 km/l

Quick Winners

Performance Tie
Mileage Territory
🔑 Ownership Territory

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

Territory

68
out of 100
11
point lead
Moderate difference between the two models.

Amarok

57
out of 100

Executive Summary

Territory has a slight advantage, but Amarok remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Equal
Efficiency Territory +1 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality Territory +6 pts
Ownership Territory +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 16/20

Amarok

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Amarok

Pros
  • No major strengths identified
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: General Use
🏆 Overall Winner

Territory

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • No major weaknesses identified
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Amarok

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round SUV

Territory

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Amarok Territory
Ground Clearance 192 190
Wheelbase 3097 2716
Length 5254 4630
Width 1944 1935
Height 1834 1706
Kerb Weight 2095 1635
Gross Vehicle Weight 3150 2150
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 0 448
Towing Capacity 3500 1200
Specification Amarok Territory
Engine 2.0L TDI Turbo Diesel 1.8L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled Inline 4 Turbocharged
Displacement 1968 1798
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 125 140
Torque 400 320
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Twin Turbo -
Top Speed 180 185
0-100 km/h 10.5 9.8

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Territory wins this comparison with 68 points vs 57 points for Amarok.

In structured scoring, Territory emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Amarok may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Territory performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amarok scores 7 while Territory scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amarok scores 18 and Territory scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amarok scores 12 versus Territory scoring 16. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amarok 7 and Territory 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amarok scoring 13 compared to Territory scoring 13, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Territory may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Territory performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Territory the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amarok and Territory in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amarok scores 13 vs 13.

Efficiency: Amarok scores 7 vs 8.

Safety: Amarok scores 18 vs 18.

Practicality: Amarok scores 7 vs 13.

Ownership: Amarok scores 12 vs 16.

Final structured scoring gives Territory the advantage in this comparison.