Volkswagen Amarok vs Honda Amaze

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Volkswagen Amarok in South Africa

Volkswagen Amarok

ZAR 690,000 – 980,000
⚡ 125 hp
🔧 400 Nm
⛽ 12.8 km/l
VS
Honda Amaze in South Africa

Honda Amaze

ZAR 254,900 – 289,900
⚡ 66 hp
🔧 110 Nm
⛽ 18.2 km/l

Quick Winners

Performance Amarok
Mileage Amaze
🔑 Ownership Tie

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

Amarok

57
out of 100
11
point lead
Moderate difference between the two models.

Amaze

46
out of 100

Executive Summary

Amarok has a slight advantage, but Amaze remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Amarok +8 pts
Efficiency Amaze +4 pts
Safety Amarok +12 pts
Practicality Amaze +5 pts
Ownership Equal

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Amarok

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

Amaze

Performance 5/20
Efficiency 11/20
Safety 6/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Amarok

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: Highway Driving

Amaze

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Amarok

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Amaze

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Amarok Amaze
Ground Clearance 192 170
Wheelbase 3097 2470
Length 5254 3995
Width 1944 1695
Height 1834 1498
Kerb Weight 2095 980
Gross Vehicle Weight 3150 1420
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 0 420
Towing Capacity 3500 900
Specification Amarok Amaze
Engine 2.0L TDI Turbo Diesel 1.2L i-VTEC Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled Inline 4 Cylinder Naturally Aspirated
Displacement 1968 1199
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 125 66
Torque 400 110
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Multi-Point Fuel Injection
Turbocharger Twin Turbo -
Top Speed 180 170
0-100 km/h 10.5 14.5

Final Verdict

🏆 Volkswagen Amarok wins this comparison with 57 points vs 46 points for Amaze.

In structured scoring, Amarok emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Amaze may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Amarok performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amarok scores 7 while Amaze scores 11 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amarok scores 18 and Amaze scores 6. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amarok scores 12 versus Amaze scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amarok 7 and Amaze 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amarok scoring 13 compared to Amaze scoring 5, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Amarok may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Amarok performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Amarok the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amarok and Amaze in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amarok scores 13 vs 5.

Efficiency: Amarok scores 7 vs 11.

Safety: Amarok scores 18 vs 6.

Practicality: Amarok scores 7 vs 12.

Ownership: Amarok scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Amarok the advantage in this comparison.